Talk:更多

Sum of parts? 更多, 更少, 更大, 更高, 更長, 更遠, 更有趣 ... Hbrug 04:07, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
 * This is an interesting case. Clearly, 更多 is different from your other examples in that you cannot easily add -er or an adverbial more to the translation of the modified word.  In the case of 更少, it is quite easy to take the translation for 少 (few) and add an -er to the end, giving you fewer.  However, in the case of 更多, I can't think of a natural way to add -er or an adverbial more to the translation of 多 (many, much, a lot).  That's because the comparative form of much or many is an adjectival more (a single word), not "more much" or "more many" or "mucher" or "manier".  I believe that was Tooironic's original rational for adding 更多.  On the other hand, I could not find 更多 in any Chinese dictionary, which makes it difficult to justify including it, unless a clarification to Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion is agreed upon by enough contributors.  In short, one would have to successfully argue that a sum of parts word or phrase may be included if no suitable sum of parts translation exists.  I have no strong opinion either way.  If you feel like debating the question further, you could always  the entry.  -- A-cai 19:25, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

RFD discussion: August–September 2017
SOP? See the talk page. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 02:03, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wyang (talk) 02:16, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
 * If there's no other meaning of this word then Delete. Dokurrat (talk) 09:21, 11 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment. I added that eight years ago. Can't think of any good arguments to keep it. ---&#62; Tooironic (talk) 14:35, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
 * RFD failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 04:31, 16 September 2017 (UTC)