Talk:有成

RFD discussion: June–September 2017
RFD for "Used other than as an idiom" section: we don't need a sense for every incorrect word segmentation. They are very common and never to be completed. (examples of incorrect word segmentations: 鼠标垫增强了鼠标的可用性, 为人民服务, 对这个常数的确定有决定性的意义, 努力学习语法规则)--2001:DA8:201:3512:BCE6:D095:55F1:36DE 20:05, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
 * It's not exactly an incorrect word segmentation; it's just kind of SOP. It might be useful to keep, but I don't really have a strong argument for keeping. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 20:23, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
 * in my opinion 仲有成百個人排緊隊喎 is better interpreted as 仲有/成百個人/排緊隊/喎.--2001:DA8:201:3512:BCE6:D095:55F1:36DE 20:25, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I guess that makes sense. The definition comes from Cantodict, which was why it was included. What about the second example sentence? Do you think it could be spliced as 我手頭上/有成/十幾張飛...? — justin(r)leung { (t...) 20:31, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I think 成 should be a qualifier of the following number.--2001:DA8:201:3512:BCE6:D095:55F1:36DE 20:34, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Alright. I think it could be deleted., thoughts? — justin(r)leung { (t...) 21:32, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I agree. Wyang (talk) 21:39, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I guess so. —suzukaze (t・c) 02:18, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes, delete the non-idiomatic sense. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 02:31, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Deleted. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 00:02, 22 September 2017 (UTC)