Talk:查

Mandarin readings
Can it be explained in which contexts the two different Mandarin readings are used? 71.66.97.228 18:10, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Can it be explained in which contexts the two different Mandarin readings are used? 71.66.97.228 19:35, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

Can it be explained in which contexts the two different Mandarin readings are used? 173.89.236.187 23:32, 3 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Done —suzukaze (t・c) 07:06, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

RFV discussion: January–February 2016
Rfv-sense "hawthorn". Tagged but not listed. - -sche (discuss) 22:41, 31 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The Japanese variant form appears in the term .  The Chinese equivalent appears to be, as given at online Chinese dictionary MDBG, with that entry clearly listing  as a variant spelling, using this same 查 character.  As such, I'm inclined to think the  sense is valid, but that might just be me.
 * ,, @Anatoli, other ZH editors: can any of you shed more light on this? ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 16:46, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
 * says 查 zhā 2. 同“楂”, which means that 查 and 楂 are equivalent. --kc_kennylau (talk) 17:39, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
 * In case you need another confirmation - in Pleco: 查 or 査 with the Mandarin reading zhā, Cantonese caa4 is same as 楂 as in 山楂.--Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 20:44, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Not caa4, but zaa1. --kc_kennylau (talk) 10:00, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

"government official"
is there any relation to ? —Suzukaze-c◇◇ 06:57, 19 December 2018 (UTC)