Talk:水錶

Are you sure about 2-1 for 錶? — justin(r)leung { (t...) 05:08, 7 June 2016 (UTC)


 * It was in the text for 水表 originally. It does make sense if you treat 錶 as a variant form of 表. 'biu2-1' is also in 手錶. Alternatively if you treat it as an independent character and ignore the variant/etym link, then it would be just 'biu1'. Wyang (talk) 05:13, 7 June 2016 (UTC)


 * OK, I guess that makes sense. Thanks! — justin(r)leung { (t...) 05:19, 7 June 2016 (UTC)