Talk:溍

zh-forms Box
Would it be possible for you to insert  and   to Module:zh-forms so that the characters 溍 and 溍 (both encoded under the same code point) can be displayed correctly? Thanks. KevinUp (talk) 11:53, 7 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Lol, added. I had to remove css so that the appropriate trad/simp fonts can be displayed. I hope that is the correct/proper way to do it. Wyang (talk) 12:10, 7 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Thanks. Problem solved. KevinUp (talk) 12:15, 7 June 2018 (UTC)


 * ,, , Hi. After the most recent edit in Module:zh-forms , the zh-forms box isn't displaying the proper traditional and simplified forms based on the language tag. Also, I think it would be preferable to add in such characters manually rather than letting it do so automatically. If you look carefully in revision 49664286 , some characters added to the   list such as ,  show no significant difference between traditional and simplified forms in the Unicode charts. I don't think it is necessary to split between traditional and simplified forms for characters that show only minor cosmetic differences (mostly in the stroke direction) such as 今 /今 , 氐 /氐 , 令 /令 , 艾 /艾 , 叟 /叟 , 丰 /丰 , 犮 /犮 , <font size=4.5, lang="zh-hant">壬 /<font size=4.5, lang="zh-hans">壬 , <font size=4.5, lang="zh-hant">呈 /<font size=4.5, lang="zh-hans">呈 . Instead, these differences should be noted in the translingual section (either as alternative forms or in their respective ids). KevinUp (talk) 13:08, 8 June 2018 (UTC)


 * I think it would be much better to add something such as  to characters such as <font size=4.5, lang="zh-hant">珊 /<font size=4.5, lang="zh-hans">珊, <font size=4.5, lang="zh-hant">琤 /<font size=4.5, lang="zh-hans">琤 , <font size=4.5, lang="zh-hant">猺 /<font size=4.5, lang="zh-hans">猺 , <font size=4.5, lang="zh-hant">瘟 /<font size=4.5, lang="zh-hans">瘟 , <font size=4.5, lang="zh-hant">莒 /<font size=4.5, lang="zh-hans">莒  as these characters are special exceptions that have been unified when compared with characters such as  /  and  /  and  /  and  /  and  /  that have been disunified. It should also be noted that  is slightly inconsistent, with derived characters of 冊 / 册 , 爭 / 争 , 䍃 , 𥁕 / 昷 , 呂 / 吕  for example, not unified consistently. Some frequently used characters are split into separate code points whereas rarely used characters are unified. I would suggest adding   to such anomalies when encountered. KevinUp (talk) 10:22, 9 June 2018 (UTC)