Talk:烏

Hi Frank. I am not sure if I got Shanghainese right, pls check if you can. I also notice that dialectal data mismatch on numbering the Wu tones, e.g. 13 vs 23. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 10:18, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi Anatoli, it should be 1u. The difference between 13 vs 23 is negligible, within interspeaker (and even intraspeaker) variation. Wyang (talk) 10:25, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Perhaps it's better to decide in favour of one or the other method and make the data match in various sections and not just for Wu? Just a suggestion. It might be hard, I don't know. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 10:34, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Yeah, that might be useful. I'm too lazy to do it on a root level, so I just added a 'correction' in zh-pron to convert Shanghainese 13 to 23. There remains much work to be done about those data modules, for example they are preferably reformatted like Module:zh/data/dial-syn ones, so that people can easily add the ipa for whatever variety they want. These bugs will (eventually) be addressed in Version 1.3 of dial pron scheduled to arrive on ... Wyang (talk) 10:47, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for doing all this work. Quite impressive! Perhaps you can also come up with a method to reverse engineer some kind of future transliteration for badly neglected topolects - Jin, Gan, Xiang, Hui, etc. from the dialectal data and make those appear in the top pronunciation section and add those term to PoS categories? If the data is reconciled with other transliteration for Wu, Min Dong, these could be boosted a little as well. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 12:12, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes, potentially. lua... Wyang (talk) 21:56, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

RFV discussion: February–April 2022
Chinese. Rfv-sense: (～溪) Synonym of 大肚溪, a river on Taiwan. Is it used alone? RcAlex36 (talk) 08:24, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
 * RFV failed. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 09:51, 19 April 2022 (UTC)