Talk:牛扒葉

RFV discussion: January–March 2021
No hits in Google Books. Looks like a typo for 牛百葉 or 牛柏葉. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 22:57, 21 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The pronunciation is also dubious. It looks like it was just inferred based on the characters. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 22:58, 21 January 2021 (UTC)


 * This is where I saw it: . The dog2 (talk) 23:15, 21 January 2021 (UTC)


 * That's not durably archived. Please review WT:ATTEST to see what that means. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 00:01, 22 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete. RcAlex36 (talk) 00:18, 22 January 2021 (UTC)


 * That doesn't really work here because we're not dealing with a sense that's covered by another. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 01:57, 22 January 2021 (UTC)


 * RFV failed. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 18:48, 19 March 2021 (UTC)