Talk:白苹

The word should not have such a simplifed entry
It's proscribed. Textbooks in Mainland China are written like this: 肠断白𬞟洲（）and I already submitted according to the guideline. Maraschino Cherry (talk) 05:57, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

RFD discussion: January–May 2024
Chinese. Non-standard simplified form. I just created a page with the right simplified form and bidirectionally linked it to the main entry 白蘋. Now this old page created by a bot should be able to get deleted. Maraschino Cherry (talk) 05:42, 12 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Also, the automatic simplification as in Template:zh-x, Template:zh-l, etc, should get corrected, too, yet I don't know how. Maraschino Cherry (talk) 05:45, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. Since it's a rare case of 1:2 mapping between traditional and simplified and 蘋 -> 苹 is much more common than 蘋 -> 𬞟, I don't think the automatic simplification will be corrected. We'll just have to deal with it manually. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 15:26, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
 * @Justinrleung @Maraschino Cherry Are we sure this never gets used as a nonstandard simplified form? I can certainly see being referred to as . Theknightwho (talk) 17:36, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Part of this is due to automatic conversion between traditional and simplified, and the other part is that many years ago the simplified character 𬞟 is difficult to input and show, many devices and input methods just don't support it. Maraschino Cherry (talk) 17:51, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I guess it's more of an RFV issue then. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 19:41, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
 * @Justinrleung @Maraschino Cherry Alright - let's move the discussion to WT:RFVCJK. If it passes, we can add it to zh-forms with . Theknightwho (talk) 23:16, 2 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Moved to RFV. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 18:00, 8 May 2024 (UTC)