Talk:簡若是

RFV discussion: February–October 2019
Any evidence for this? — justin(r)leung { (t...) 06:00, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Oh, I made that entry when 簡若 was the main entry, and not 敢若 for the entry 敢若是. Though technically, 簡若是 does appear in the example in p.384 of 闽南方言大词典 as "~是". You could delete it if you want, since the entry is now transferred. --Mar vin kaiser (talk) 06:06, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Yeah, that's kind of tricky, but it's probably not good evidence for it anyway. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 06:10, 28 February 2019 (UTC)


 * RFV failed. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 02:38, 21 October 2019 (UTC)