Talk:草に草生やすな

RFD discussion: April 2020–July 2022
It’s not a word but a sentence. See Tea room. — T AKASUGI Shinji (talk) 11:23, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
 * We also include phrases, which can be full sentences (e.g. ). The Tea room argument is that it is not idiomatic. But how would one know that it specifically criticizes mixed use as seen in 草wwwwwwwww? --Lambiam 06:09, 19 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete, for both wt:ATTEST and wt:SOP. -- Huhu9001 (talk) 03:16, 10 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment: These examples tend to support a case for ATTEST (except that they are mention, rather than use, of the phrase). But at the same time might weaken a case for SOP, as it seems like other references to "grass" or "growing" can be substituted (but but, I am now doubting that that conclusion can be drawn, at least from the evidence below).
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * I can't decide whether this suggests keeping or deleting the entry. Cnilep (talk) 23:52, 1 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Meh, delete anyway as failing to meet WT:ATTEST. —Fish bowl (talk) 08:25, 28 February 2022 (UTC)


 * RFD deleted. —Fish bowl (talk) 01:47, 2 July 2022 (UTC)