Talk:襪带

RFD discussion: February–March 2016
Mixture of traditional and simplified. Nibiko (talk) 07:55, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Hmm. It seems to be amply attested on . It also gets lots of Google Image hits which confirm that it has the meaning that is claimed. Keep as a redirect (which is what it is right now), at least. - -sche (discuss) 22:19, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Out of curiosity, is this at all similar to a "common misspelling" in other languages? ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 22:22, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
 * It seems nonstandard because the latter character seems to have been created in simplified Chinese rather than being a variant. Nibiko (talk) 23:04, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Try doing ctrl+f "襪带" on any of the pages for those search results. Nibiko (talk) 23:04, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
 * It's a common misspelling caused by a conversion problem. We can make it into a redirect or "a common misspelling" entry. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 01:33, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
 * I just went through all pages of those Google Books search results, and all of those matches were either the full traditional form (襪帶) or the full simplified form (袜带), and none were for this mixed form (襪带). Google doesn't restrict up to the codepoint except for a Verbatim search in the "All" tab. Nibiko (talk) 13:23, 10 February 2016 (UTC)


 * As a redirect, this serves a helpful technical purpose. Keep. Smurrayinchester (talk) 16:52, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
 * (Weirdly, zh:襪带 exists) Smurrayinchester (talk) 16:54, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
 * That's because a bot made the entry. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 01:33, 10 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Kept as redirect. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 17:24, 4 March 2016 (UTC)