Talk:設備

RFV discussion: April–July 2014
Rfv-sense - Etymology 2. No reference. Seems to be a strange choice of kanji for such a concept. Jamesjiao → T ◊ C 02:17, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Added by our favorite IP, who probably misinterpreted something he found online somewhere. Chuck Entz (talk) 02:28, 29 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Absolute bonkers silliness. No idea where he (I'm assuming "he") gets some of this stuff.  Next thing, we'll find out that  has a new sense, .  My, what a wonderfully exciting world we live in.
 * (For the record, the JA term means.
 * I'll clean up the entry. &#8209;&#8209; Eiríkr Útlendi │ Tala við mig 06:43, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks mate. This user is obviously a Naruto fan. I am thinking of banning him/her again for dodging IP ban and for making substandard, unreferenced edits. Jamesjiao → T ◊ C 01:53, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
 * They're a big anime fan, and don't seem to realize that anime wroters and artists make up a great deal of the mythology they use, or borrow it from elsewhere.
 * There are several of us who block this person on sight (they geolocate to Sky Broadband in England, with occasionaly stints on Easynet, also in England), but they've gotten in the habit of doing quick bursts of editing, then changing their IP. After seeing the odd language used in the request they made on Feedback yesterday, I'm beginning to think there may be mental issues involved. Not that I'm surprised- based on their edit history and failure to learn from the reaction to their contributions, there certainly seems to be a bit of a detachment from reality.
 * I'm starting to use mass delete (Special:Nuke) on their page creations and revert everything that looks questionable just to see if we can discourage them from constantly adding stuff- I've seen too many cases where they get reverted or the pointless clutter they add to entries gets pruned, but they come back and add it again until it slips by because no one is paying attention at the moment. They don't just mess with Japanese and Mandarin, either: there are lots of their junk edits pervading the English-language coverage of anything having to do with deities and personifications of death, and they go off on weird tangents every once in a while- it took me forever to get them to realize that there's no such thing as a "single-malt brandy", for instance. Chuck Entz (talk) 02:42, 30 April 2014 (UTC)


 * It was previously agreed to Special:Nuke their new edits, regardless of quality. That's the only way to discourage him/her. The anon misuses the system and distracts editors. It takes more to clean up the mess than creating new entries. Simple ones (ja, cmn, ko, vi) can now be generated with User:Wyang's tools. BTW, Chinese topolects are now being merged into one L2. --Anatoli (обсудить/вклад) 02:50, 30 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Speedied by . — Ungoliant (falai) 23:32, 14 July 2014 (UTC)