Talk:譁變

RFM discussion: October–December 2017
It should be moved to "嘩變", if possible. --115.134.2.1 15:17, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Why? I thought we kept Chinese entries at their Traditional versions and listed Simplified versions as soft redirects. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 15:54, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
 * 譁變 and 嘩變 are both traditional forms. 嘩變 does seem to give more hits on Google (: 63,700 hits; : 134,000). That said, the searches don't guarantee that there was no machine trad-to-simp conversion involved. Many traditional dictionaries only have 譁變, including 教育部重編國語辭典修訂本, 教育部國語辭典簡編本, 中華語文大辭典, and 遠流活用中文大辭典. Hanyu Da Cidian has both, but the quotations given for 嘩變 are all in simplified Chinese. 朗文中文新詞典 has both; 譁 has a note 亦作「嘩」. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 03:54, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
 * (Don't easily doubt Justin's edits, lol. Wyang (talk) 04:14, 10 October 2017 (UTC))

So does it mean that this page can be moved? --TNMPChannel 18:06, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
 * No. I have raised concerns about moving above. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 14:40, 13 October 2017 (UTC)


 * No action taken. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 22:18, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

RFM discussion: April 2022–September 2023

 * See Talk:砲響.