Talk:車

Very cool. Me like. --Maveric149

Wait a minute. I only see a box.

Then you dont have the Unicode for that character -fonzy

RFV discussion: October 2020–July 2022
Rfv-sense: "pornography". — justin(r)leung { (t...) 15:43, 23 October 2020 (UTC) 跪求图中车牌号~！！有老司机发车吗！！！！ 利物浦大将赛后直播公然"发车"！队友光屁股入镜了_手机网易网
 * -- Huhu9001 (talk) 09:39, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Hmm, anything durably archived? — justin(r)leung { (t...) 22:30, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Google "公然发车". -- Huhu9001 (talk) 12:10, 15 May 2021 (UTC)


 * It seems to be used in other contexts, with a wider meaning of "lewd content"? Like 開車 and 車速, etc. But I'm not sure if we can find durably archived quotes for this. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 17:11, 21 October 2021 (UTC)


 * 1 citation found (Citations:車圖). --沈澄心✉ 07:54, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Very common internet slang used primarily to avoid censorship but then became a popular neologism replacing its more "vulgur" synonyms. --H2NCH2COOH (Talk) 04:07, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Please leave the RFV tag there until 3 citations are given per WT:ATTEST. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 07:41, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
 * To me this is so common in both mainland and Taiwan that it meets the criterion one and needs no further validation. Just search any lewd term with 車/车 and you will understand that it is a waste of time to do step 2. --H2NCH2COOH (Talk) 08:16, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
 * If you really need any citation, here are some:  . --H2NCH2COOH (Talk) 08:38, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
 * The clear widespread use clause is hard to interpret, and in this case, where it's still considered neologistic, it would be best to be verified through the second step. The links you provide are neither durably archived nor uses (rather than mentions). — justin(r)leung { (t...) 09:22, 19 April 2022 (UTC)


 * ——落花有意12138 (talk) 11:23, 30 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Cited. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 07:23, 21 July 2022 (UTC)


 * RFV passed. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 21:53, 31 July 2022 (UTC)