Talk:轉法輪

RFD discussion: October–November 2017
Name of a book. White Snowflakes (talk) 16:02, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Removed. Entry has been cleaned up. Wyang (talk) 01:55, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
 * For the record, names of books are governed by WT:NSE, which allows editor discretion as to keeping. This deletion was out of process. --Dan Polansky (talk) 08:47, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I have unstruck the heading so discussion on whether the book sense ("Zhuan Falun main book of Falun Dafa") should have been deleted can continue. — SGconlaw (talk) 09:34, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
 * There is no need to discuss this. This is obviously outside the scope of Wiktionary, and was created with an agenda.  doesn't even have a Wikipedia page. We don't even have Harry Potter, why the double standards? Wyang (talk) 09:45, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I know of the Falun Gong's existence but nothing of their beliefs or texts. WT:NSE permits the inclusion of the titles of works provided they are attested (the Qur'an is given as an example). The non-existence of an English Wikipedia page is not conclusive. Send this to RFV? (Incidentally, Harry Potter is not the name of a book, but a character from a series of books and films. The term would have to satisfy WT:FICTION to be included.) — SGconlaw (talk) 10:07, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
 *  is the name of the novel series, as well as the name of the character. The absence of an English Wikipedia page is of course indicative. This is just common sense: Is Zhuan Falun even remotely at the same level of the Qur'an, or other books in Category:en:Books? Apparently no, otherwise it would have at least warranted an article on Wikipedia for its literary value. Wyang (talk) 10:16, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Even though the deletion was out of process, I am closing this discussion since there have been no further comments for more than a month. — SGconlaw (talk) 06:50, 17 November 2017 (UTC)