Talk:鋭アクセント

RFV discussion: March–April 2020
Apparently the spelling is based on the Japanese Wikipedia article. 27,500 results on Google seem small... ～ POKéTalker（═◉═） 03:32, 21 March 2020 (UTC)


 * It's a term, but the is not pronounced.
 * That entry was created just last week by . They are apparently not a native speaker / reader of Japanese, and I suspect that they were confused by the notation in the JA WP article, specifically the last bolded bit:

アキュート・アクセント（）または アクサンテギュは、おもにラテン文字を用いる言語の表記に用いられるアクセント符号で、ダイアクリティカルマーク（発音区別符号）の一種. 揚音符（ようおんぷ）、揚音符号（ようおんふごう）、鋭アクセントと呼ばれることもある.


 * Note that the description here does not assign any reading or pronunciation to the character in .  Assuming that the reading is  is a mistake.
 * Poking around elsewhere online, I find scanty but likely evidence (see this Chiebukuro post, search the page for 鋭) that this is instead read as, where is a gloss or partial calque of , i.e. , which is the base meaning of the  character.  Barring any other evidence, I believe this is the correct reading.
 * , do you have any further insight? ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 23:12, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
 * You are right. is correct. — T AKASUGI Shinji (talk) 11:37, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
 * , I initially thought that way because in the 锐 page, one of the derived terms is 鋭アクセント does has "アキュート" on top of 鋭. My assumption was that 鋭 is for semantic purposes and just a variant of アキュート・アクセント.  Shen233 (talk) 23:31, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Aha, ya, it looks like added that compound, but without any ruby, with  adding the ruby .  Perhaps then KevinUp was the one initially misled by the JA WP article.  Well, mystery mostly solved, and confusing content corrected, so all's well that ends well.  :)  ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 16:02, 27 March 2020 (UTC)


 * RFV-resolved. Apparently the term itself was never in doubt? —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 04:54, 21 April 2020 (UTC)