Talk:飼

Etymology
Neither pronunciation data given by och-l belongs to though. I don't think use och-l is a good idea. Dokurrat (talk) 12:07, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure I understand what you mean... but anyway, I don't think it's important. Wyang (talk) 12:12, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Oh... *lɯɡs = 食, *ɦljɯɡ= 食. I think the OCH pronunciation of 飼 should = 食 (which did not give a Zhengzhang restruction, which I think would be *ljɯs). That's what I meant. Dokurrat (talk) 12:16, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
 * When I used och-l, I actually meant the main pronunciation of 食 ("to eat"), since 飼 ("to feed") is derived from that. But it is not important - the reconstructions are a bit confusing anyway. Wyang (talk) 12:25, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
 * The Zhengzhang's reconstruction has been updated in second edition. (https://www.amazon.cn/dp/B00HF43F60) The explanation might have been changed there. So may I ask if you can check the 2nd? (Unfortunately I don't have the 2nd Edition.It's in section S.)--Yoshiciv (talk) 07:57, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes, I'm still waiting for someone to kindly key in the data and share them online. Please let me know if you (or anyone) is aware of such resource. Wyang (talk) 08:17, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
 * I've checked the second edition. The reconstruction of "/*ljɯs/ 同飤見書孔傳" is unchanged, though another reconstruction, maybe "sɦljɯɡs", is added.--Yoshiciv (talk) 08:07, 5 June 2018 (UTC)