Talk:魔法

魔法
OK this is getting ridiculous Japanese editors - why don't we just copy and paste an entire Wikipedia article here for ya? ---&gt; Tooironic 23:46, 7 August 2011 (UTC)


 * IP user User_talk:90.209.77.78 is probably the same one as User_talk:90.209.77.109, and both are the most active editors of this entry. (Special:Contributions/2.125.74.121 is the other main IP user, which address I think I've seen mentioned as a known-disruptive-but-not-entirely-malicious user.)  90.209.77.78 has self-described themselves as having Asperger's, which might explain the obsessively exhaustive lists of compounds and synonyms (many of which are manga-only, as best I can tell), and given the nearness of the IP address, I suspect 90.209.77.109 is the same person.  In my dealings with 78, they appear to be earnest and acting in good faith, but apparently a bit in the dark as to what is appropriate for inclusion on a Wiktionary entry page.  They don't check their messages very often, but blocking has in the past prompted 78 to take a look at their Talk page.


 * I don't have the time or energy right now to sift through the complete mess of the 魔法 page myself, but I would strongly recommend that any and all edits by all three of these users (Special:Contributions/90.209.77.78, Special:Contributions/90.209.77.109, Special:Contributions/2.125.74.121) be checked thoroughly. -- Cheers, Eiríkr Útlendi │ Tala við mig 19:22, 8 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Oo, the stinker (user 90.209.77.109) reverted my cleanup of 魔法. Is there any way of blocking an IP user from reverting logged in users?  Also wondering if we should just block this user outright for a short while?  They certainly aren't playing well or paying much attention to their Talk page...  -- Eiríkr Útlendi │ Tala við mig 15:59, 9 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Going over the obsessively exhaustive list of "See alsos", I ultimately decided to just remove them -- such lists do not appear to belong in a dictionary entry, many of the terms listed are of dubious provenance, some appear to be flat-out bogus, many have incorrect readings, the formatting is a mess, etc. etc. etc... -- Cheers, Eiríkr Útlendi │ Tala við mig 22:18, 9 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Since the editor keeps reinserting laundry lists of terms (this time as "synonyms of related terms"), I have protected the page for the time being. --EncycloPetey 01:47, 10 August 2011 (UTC)


 * I've done my best to clean up most of the junk. ---&gt; Tooironic 01:33, 11 August 2011 (UTC)


 * I've cleared out the rest of the cruft. Striking from the list as finally cleaned. -- Eiríkr Útlendi │ Tala við mig