Talk:麥復

Character choice
I was wondering if you had any reasoning for picking this character. In the absence of a better documented option, I think we should follow 台日大辭典 (be̍h-hiūⁿ) and use 芒 instead of 復. What do you think? — justin(r)leung { (t...) 07:12, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
 * I agree with you, I didn't know that this word existed in that source when I made the entry. --Mar vin kaiser (talk) 07:45, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Though the character 芒 dfoesn't really have a pronunciation like that, right? This would be a 假借, if ever. --Mar vin kaiser (talk) 07:47, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
 * It would be a 訓讀 (semantic borrowing). — justin(r)leung { (t...) 07:48, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Ah yes, 訓讀. Which I guess should be placed in the pronunciation notes. --Mar vin kaiser (talk) 07:53, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
 * It wouldn't say it's necessary since I've treated it as two different etymologies. I've moved the entry to 麥芒 and deleted 麥復/麦复. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 08:05, 4 December 2022 (UTC)