Talk:黃人

黃人, 黄人
Not a word. Wyang (talk) 21:35, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes, delete, the correct term is or  (abbreviated). --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 21:57, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
 * It's in the ABC Chinese-English Dictionary. Wiki  Winters ☯ 韦安智  22:55, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
 * .. which is not a particularly reliable source. Concrete examples are needed. Wyang (talk) 23:09, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
 * . --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 04:08, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
 * There are other good-looking hits in Google books. I also trust ABC dictionary, which ships with Wenlin software. Tentatively keep for now. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 04:15, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Ok then. Although this is not the derogatory modern sense in the article... Wyang (talk) 10:15, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
 * If it helps, my Chinese professor did tell me that the term existed and that it was derogatory. Wiki  Winters ☯ 韦安智  03:44, 26 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Note: is currently missing, but it's definitely a word in Japanese, albeit rare and possibly dated.  Shogakukan's 国語大辞典 (Kokugo Dai Jiten) lists this as a synonym or possible abbreviation of.
 * I also see that Google finds many instances of 黃人 as Chinese, particularly in the image search (safe for work). :)
 * ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 22:11, 25 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Those pictures refer to . Wyang (talk) 22:31, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Oh, phooey -- my humour was too oblique. :)     Yes, if you look at the search box, that was even the string I entered into Google Image.  ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 23:26, 25 November 2015 (UTC)


 * If you search further, you will encounter this usage in Chinese: (18+ disclaimer). You will understand if you read 黃. :) Wyang (talk) 23:38, 25 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep until a RFD-relevant rationale is provided; "not a word" is not one. If the existence of the term is questioned, RFV is the proper venue. --Dan Polansky (talk) 13:38, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Kept. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 01:31, 11 December 2015 (UTC)