Talk:갓

Etymology 6
Are you sure about this section? —Suzukaze-c◇◇ 01:38, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi, Suzukaze-c. I have made this section because the syllable can be represented by hanja 加 and 假. Now, I am aware that 표준국어대사전 does not mention this fact, but if you look up 갓 in Martin, Lee & Chang (1975)'s dictionary at pages 57-58, you will find that there are a few Sino-Korean words, mainly,  and  (also written , but the former spelling seems to be etymological), which can indeed be represented by those two hanja. Again, for some reason 표준국어대사전 does not have any of these words, but Naver does give some information (though, I must admit, very limited) about 갓법. If you search for 갓법 in Naver, it will return the compound words  and , and, as you can see, the latter has an hanja writing which contains 加. In conclusion, although the Sino-Korean words associated with those hanja are difficult to find in online dictionaries, I don't think there is some doubt that they actually exist, and if Martin, Lee & Chang (1975) register them, I think there are good reasons to maintain this section, if you are ok with it. — Sorjam (talk) 11:53, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Hm, a quick Google search for "갓법 加法" suggests that this -s is the 사이시옷. IMO, #Etymology 6 is not proper. —Suzukaze-c◇◇ 15:05, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
 * ? —Suzukaze-c◇◇ 15:06, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi. is not the Hangeul reading of  and . If you are able to find examples such as,  and , please add them as archaic spellings under the "Alternative forms" section of , ,  on a case-by-case basis. KevinUp (talk) 15:18, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Ok. Since the section has already been amended, I will certainly add those two archaic spellings under the corresponding entries. I didn't thought about the possibility that the -s could be 사이시옷 in this case. My mistake. So, thank you,, for the correction. — Sorjam (talk) 19:37, 28 July 2019 (UTC)