Talk:는

Should be merged with 은, like eul and keul


 * On the English Wiktionary we don't merge synonyms or alternative spellings. They should be synchronised however. &mdash; Hippietrail 22:43, 7 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Does that mean we should have the same information in both articles (은/는), or does that mean we should have something like "see " in one of the articles. Winged eel 20:23, 2 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Yes it's tricky. You could look at colour/color or a/an or this/these or eat/ate. Basically having lots of information or duplicate information is never a mistake but synchronisation is always an issue. There has also been more talk recently of an "Alternative forms" section rather than just an "Alternative spellings" section. &mdash; Hippietrail 13:54, 3 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Okay, so duplication is the way to go, but how does one actually go about synchronizing? Do you just mean there should be a link saying that these are the same? Or, is "synchronization" an actual term meaning I have to use some sort of template?Winged eel 17:35, 3 January 2008 (UTC)