Talk:볏

RFC discussion: July–August 2010
I'm assuming that the etymology should be in the etymology. It almost looks like a mistake, a copy-and-paste error. Is it saying this Korean was is from Latin? Mglovesfun (talk) 10:33, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
 * It's a entry.  is known for crackpot etymologies. Removed the stuff. —Internoob (Disc•Cont) 02:50, 13 August 2010 (UTC)