Talk:서울

Capitalisation of proper nouns
the translit should capitalise transliteration of proper nouns, e.g. "Seoul", not "seoul". It's standard and it's a general convention here. Sorry for being a pain. :) --Anatoli (обсудить/вклад) 01:52, 14 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Do you mean the transliteration in the headword template below the 'proper nouns' header? I have just changed Module:ko-headword to account for that. Wyang (talk) 01:57, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes, you're doing it faster than I add suggestions. Well done! --Anatoli (обсудить/вклад) 02:00, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

RFV discussion: August–October 2017
RFV for generic noun sense. Is it still used as a generic word for capital city, or is it perhaps archaic? Anti-Gamz Dust (There's Hillcrest!) 20:17, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
 * The sense is not obsolete and is used in dictionaries. If you're just curious, you could have started a discussion in WT:RFT because here, in RFV people question the existence of a term or its senses (obsolete or modern, doesn't matter). If you insist on the verification, you should also mark the term with . If nobody provides a citation, the sense will be deleted in due course. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 05:46, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Struck as the sense is easily verifiable. Wyang (talk) 10:45, 19 October 2017 (UTC)