Talk:오다

Etymology
, any chance that Vovin's etymology is based on a misparsing of a compound?

Modern KO has +  →. Perhaps the MK forms etc. derive from  +  → ?

Curious, ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 00:53, 29 November 2021 (UTC)


 * @Eirikr Middle Korean also has, not . I don't think it normally happens that leads a compound verb.--Tibidibi (talk) 00:58, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Ya, no argument about the existence of 🇨🇬, that's even mentioned there in the etym at 🇨🇬. I was wondering if there might be any textual evidence for the existence of anything along the lines of 오나다, at either the 🇨🇬 or 🇨🇬 levels, and/or in any of the dialects.  The odd  that appears in the different conjugation forms seems to align with at least some of the conjugations of, which gave rise to the question mark in my own mind.  ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 03:57, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
 * @Eirikr The 나 in MK 오〮나라〮 is an allomorph of 거. MK 거 is a descendant of two origins: one of 겨, the other of 거.
 * 겨 encoded meaning irrelevant to tense-aspect; 거 encoded meaning related to tense-aspect.
 * The 나 in MK 오〮나라〮 is the allomorph of 거 which encoded meaning related to tense-aspect. It is a perfect aspect marker. Its temporal position is near the present, so its effects remain in the present (recent past, near past, or immediate past).
 * 오〮나라〮 is the conjugated form that expresses that the event of coming occurred immediately before the speech time.
 * Compare to: https://accesson.kr/rks/assets/pdf/7867/journal-22-1-71.pdf
 * 나 hat nothing to do with 나다. 80.187.102.11 10:06, 30 March 2024 (UTC)