Talk:오적어

Is this term actually in use? Or should it be sent to RFV? —Suzukaze-c (talk) 13:17, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
 * , I would RFV it. 오적어 is seen almost solely in the context of discussing historical sources (composed in Classical Chinese) which use the Chinese word, so I would consider this a sort of Sino-Korean transcription of the Chinese—if that makes sense—and not a real Korean word. stdict.korean.go.kr redirects it to 오징어 and has '오징어'를 한자를 빌려서 쓴 말이다.--Tibidibi (talk) 13:34, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
 * (in a list, which does not meet WT:ATTEST) —Fish bowl (talk) 07:36, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

RFV discussion: February 2021–March 2022
It is the 'correct' hanja reading of the etymon of, and is not in actual use as a true Korean word (Talk:오적어). —Suzukaze-c (talk) 02:23, 15 February 2021 (UTC)


 * New Ace Korean Language Dictionary (Korean dictionary on MacOS) does have an entry for it. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 06:01, 18 February 2021 (UTC)


 * RFV failed. —Fish bowl (talk) 23:32, 13 March 2022 (UTC)