Talk:𐌰𐌹𐌽𐌰𐌷𐍉

Hey, where is this form attested? Neither wulfila.be nor Koebler seem to mention it. — Kleio (t · c) 16:27, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
 * It isn't attested in this form; only the misspelling is attested (see quotation there). —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 16:34, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Ah, I see, thanks. I've added a little note to the main entry. — Kleio (t · c) 16:38, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Should it be a reconstruction then? DTLHS (talk) 16:40, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I suppose technically it could be, but it seems a little pedantic to move one nonlemma form to Reconstruction namespace when other inflected forms of the same word are attested (spelled correctly). —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 16:41, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I agree, it's just a nonlemma form, and a fairly predictable one at that. I think the little note at the lemma suffices. — Kleio (t · c) 16:42, 23 April 2017 (UTC)