Talk:𐌰𐍅𐌰

Attestation
Is this word actually attested? I can’t find anything on wulfila.be. seems to be attested only once, in Codex Ambrosianus A, but this corresponding word doesn’t seem to be attested. I know that wulfila.be isn’t perfect and doesn’t take into account the newest readings, but if this is some cutting-edge scholarship we definitely need a quotation. I don’t know where to look for confirmation. – Krun (talk) 13:29, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Good catch. It isn't attested. I don't recall it being in any of the recently discovered fragments (didn't double check but am pretty sure), it was added by an IP who added more unattested stuff (e.g. at ; these kind of reconstruction "enthusiasts", who like neglecting Wiktionary conventions and proper use of asterisks, pop up every now and then) and it's unattested per Koebler as well. — Mnemosientje (t · c) 15:58, 4 September 2018 (UTC)