Talk:𐌱𐍉𐌺𐌰

RFV discussion: April–July 2016
Rfv-sense:
 * 1) beech

It can be inferred that Gothic must have had this or a very similar word with the meaning of beech, but Gothic is almost entirely attested as biblical translations or commentaries, and the IP who added the sense is notorious for adding unattested Gothic terms. Chuck Entz (talk) 03:18, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm of two minds on this one. There is no doubt that this is the correct form and the word is real and meant "beech", and some linguistic sources will even state that as its meaning. However, it is also true that Wulfila clearly only used it in the other senses on the page, and this meaning is technically reconstructed. If the sense is removed, we need to have a usage note to that effect. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 03:47, 10 April 2016 (UTC)


 * RFV failed. Feel free to add a usage note. —Mr. Granger (talk • contribs) 22:49, 27 July 2016 (UTC)