Talk:𐌲𐌿𐍄𐌹𐍃𐌺

RFV discussion: August–November 2016
Unattested, AFAIK. — Kleio (t · c) 21:27, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
 * @ User:KIeio So wait, you mean to tell me that the word for the Gothic language itself appears not to be attested in Gothic? There should be some kind of exception here for terms like this... Philmonte101 (talk) 22:45, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
 * For instance, only needing to find 1 citation instead of 3. These can be hard to come by, so it would make sense. Philmonte101 (talk) 22:48, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
 * It's literally unattested. (And probably should've been or  anyway.) In fact even, the word for Goth, is unattested, but that one can at least be gleaned from the -just once- attested compound . Also, dead languages already require only one attestation. But yeah, unless I'm missing something, this one shouldn't be here. — Kleio (t · c) 00:07, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
 * RFV failed, now it just needs to be deleted by someone. — Kleio (t · c) 12:09, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Deleted. — SMUconlaw (talk) 07:52, 28 November 2016 (UTC)