Talk:𐌳𐌿𐌱𐍉

RFV discussion: October–December 2020
The second part of the compound, but I don' think that it is attested as a simplex; Streitberg does not know it, and Köbler has only the reconstructed *dūbō (with the sense of pigeon), which he has isolated from the compound. The only possibility I can see for its existence is an attestation in the Bologna sermon (I do not have Falluomini's newest Berichtigungen), but given that a Gothic word for 'dove, pidgeon' is already attested, in the form of, I must admit that I suspect it being a ghostword. Glésan (talk) 00:07, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Good catch. It's not in the Bononiensia, from what I can tell (judging by Falluomini's most recent publication on the subject). It should probably be moved to Reconstruction namespace. — Mnemosientje (t · c) 14:05, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
 * RFV failed and moved to Reconstruction namespace. — Mnemosientje (t · c) 12:02, 22 December 2020 (UTC)