Talk:𐌼𐍉𐍄𐌰𐍂𐌴𐌹𐍃

RFV discussion: November 2016
Tagged but not listed. Attestation added. — Kleio (t · c) 16:52, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Nobody's going to dispute a citation like that. You don't actually need to post these to RFV unless you are unsure about attestation, or are sure that there isn't any. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 03:12, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Ah, I thought you were supposed to follow the whole procedure every time someone tagged something without a quote, per the rules at the top of this page (which is also why I posted the other Gothic entry right above this one here, which had been tagged by the same editor). — Kleio (t · c) 04:08, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Well, the tagger doesn't know what they're doing in this case and the entry is cited. No reason to make this page any longer than it has to be. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 05:05, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
 * If it's just Rasptr tagging them out of spite, then I agree entirely with Metaknowledge. Renard Migrant (talk) 11:49, 2 November 2016 (UTC)


 * RFV passed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 23:33, 23 November 2016 (UTC)