Talk:𑀯𑀼𑀠


 * Yes, 52 has:
 * Sanskrit -rdh- → Prakrit -ḍḍh-
 * Terms derived from :
 * Ashokan Prakrit (Shahbazgarhi, Dhauli): vuḍha-
 * Pali and Dramatic Prakrits: vuḍḍha-


 * At R:CDIAL it says:
 * man. vadhra -- (vudhra -- ?),
 * Perhaps the reason for this is that although the Hultzsch transcription vudhra, Hultzsch also mentions that the Bühler transcription is vadhra


 * The term is also at fragment as:
 * vuḍhānaṁ dasane [ca] hiraṁna-paṭividhāne ca
 * hiraṁna has entry at  Kutchkutch (talk) 09:52, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks a lot for checking! I do have a soft copy of CGMIA downloaded from archive.org but for some reason the pages are all hopelessly jumbled and not in order. The issue with the transcription of is why I left the entry uncreated. -- 𝓑𝓱𝓪𝓰𝓪𝓭𝓪𝓽𝓽𝓪(𝓽𝓪𝓵𝓴)  10:18, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * is exactly what I think when I look at:
 * https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.143102 Kutchkutch (talk) 10:35, 5 March 2021 (UTC)