Talk:𠹌

RFV discussion: November 2017–August 2020
Rfv for Cantonese. Dokurrat (talk) 03:33, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
 * The definitions come from the Unihan Database, which got their definitions from "The Representation of Cantonese with Chinese Characters". Here are the sources cited in the article:
 * lan2 (variant of 𨶙): 洪興仔 #21 殺入筲箕灣
 * lang1 (used in 𠮩𠹌/溜𠹌): Hong Kong Judiciary unpublished glossary #4; 粵語書寫問題研究項目
 * lang3 (used in 半𠹌𠼰): Hong Kong Judiciary unpublished glossary #4 (I would pronounce this as lang1.)
 * nang3 (join, link, connect): A Study of Cantonese Words (Zeng Zifan), 粵語書寫問題研究項目
 * — justin(r)leung { (t...) 05:04, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
 * So, If my understanding is right, all pronunciations have passed rfv; sense "variant of 𨶙" has passed rfv. And sense "uncommon, rare" is not verified (yet). Dokurrat (talk) 05:30, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
 * RFV is generally not used for pronunciations. "Variant of 𨶙" doesn't pass RFV technically; see WT:ATTEST. "Uncommon, rare" is the definition for 𠮩𠹌/溜𠹌; it's not used by itself, so there should be a . — justin(r)leung { (t...) 05:34, 2 November 2017 (UTC)


 * RFV passed. Everything should be verified since Cantonese is no longer considered WT:WDL. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 07:05, 29 August 2020 (UTC)