Talk:𪜁

𪜁
Definition:
 * 1) This character does not exist

Chuck Entz (talk) 21:35, 4 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Is there a place where this information can be placed instead that can easily be found by readers? (it seems like this "nonexistent" claim is even sourced&mdash;I bet no other character-centric website can currently say the same) —suzukaze (t・c) 02:39, 5 March 2016 (UTC)


 * We could -ify it like [//en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=%F0%AA%9C%81&oldid=37488196 this]. Let's do that rather than delete it altogether. - -sche (discuss) 03:23, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
 * That might be a good idea. I thought about just speedying it, but it was far enough from what we normally deal with that I felt I should get some other opinions- so I brought it here. Chuck Entz (talk) 04:31, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
 * It seems to me this character does exist (!) however if it's not used in any human languages there's no reason to keep it. Being present in a couple of databases isn't enough. Renard Migrant (talk) 11:07, 12 March 2016 (UTC)


 * This reminds me of Category:Ghost kanji, although in the RFD discussion there it was brought up that the entries in that category were unsourceable rather than uncitable. Nibiko (talk) 21:58, 3 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Do you look in GZJW = Yinzhou Jinwen Jicheng Yinde (殷周金文集成引得) yet? When it is sourced, so it is/was used. Looks like kinda ancient form. (I could say every CJK character are sourced so Unicode implemented it.) --Octahedron80 (talk) 05:01, 12 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Resolved as a (-sche's diff, linked above). —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 20:02, 26 August 2016 (UTC)