Talk:-이다

Hi. Would it be too much work to add a full conjugation for and ? --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 03:38, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
 * How many forms do we provide for a Korean verb? is irregular in present indicative of informal register ( and ). — T AKASUGI Shinji (talk) 04:11, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
 * It's a little different in the way that there are forms with or without 이 - both 이야 and 야, 이에요 and 예요. Otherwise, it's probably similar to other verbs but should there be imperatives? --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 06:16, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm not 100% sure what the correct forms are... If I can have all the differences in the table for 이다 (from the one regularly produced), I could amend the module to include ida. Wyang (talk) 07:13, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
 * OK. I'll get the forms what I can find but I'm not sure about all the forms myself. We'll see what gaps we have. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 08:31, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I have separated 이다 and 다 on French Wiktionary, which is an easy way to display two forms. — T AKASUGI Shinji (talk) 09:28, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Test
I've made some changes to the module for try to accommodate for ida. Please help the correctness of the paradigm above. Thanks! Wyang (talk) 04:52, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
 * If 예요 is displayed with 이에요, 였어요 must be there with 이었어요 too. — T AKASUGI Shinji (talk) 05:48, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I added the 였.. forms to forms containing 이었.. is this correct? Wyang (talk) 06:58, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes, it’s correct. — T AKASUGI Shinji (talk) 09:19, 5 March 2017 (UTC)