Talk:-atio

-atio
"[W]rong analysis of -tio?" I can see why someone would say that. Renard Migrant (talk) 12:43, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Fix it or tag it, don't delete it. WCCasey (talk) 02:06, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Redirect to -tio. I think that it’s an excusable mistake. --Romanophile (talk) 14:52, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. It seems to be a compound suffix. Mentioned as -atio in MWO's etymology of -ation. Further in http://www.wordsense.eu/-atio/, etymonline.com, and multiple sources in Google books (Historical Linguistics, Theodora Bynon, 1977; Lexical Analysis: Norms and Exploitations, Patrick Hanks, 2013; A History of the Spanish Language, Ralph John Penny, 2002; etc.); see also and . Tagged in  and then changed to RFD in  by User:Fsojic. --Dan Polansky (talk) 15:58, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Kept, no consensus to delete. The definition may need to be revised. bd2412 T 15:36, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

-atio
This is just the suffix combined with the stem-final vowel of the preceding word. It's not a separate suffix. We also don't have, which has the same composition. —CodeCat 18:28, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep as a compound suffix per previoux RFD at Talk:-atio, where I mentioned multiple sources mentioning the suffix. --Dan Polansky (talk) 10:05, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

-atus, -atum
As above. The adjective-forming sense is actually a distinct etymology, and should be kept, though. —CodeCat 18:31, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

request of deleting my entry of ahmad alkandari thanks

All kept: Discussion has been opened for almost four months and only the nominator expressed a deletionist view. Pur ple back pack 89  13:17, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep as a compound suffix. The "as above" mentioned by the OP would be this: "This is just the suffix -tio combined with the stem-final vowel of the preceding word. It's not a separate suffix. We also don't have -itio, which has the same composition." Searches I perused:, . --Dan Polansky (talk) 10:13, 27 December 2015 (UTC)