Talk:-loquium

RFD discussion: February 2018–February 2019
I see no reason to use/invent/posit such a suffix. can be parsed as +  +  and  as  +  +  (as for, it's plain wrong: it's  + ). I think we should abstain from creating that kind of "compound suffixes" unless absolutely necessary; I prefer we see the forest for the trees, and keep small derivational units whenever possible. See the business with above. --Per utramque cavernam (talk) 13:38, 12 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete — Mnemosientje (t · c) 16:32, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
 * RFD deleted. — Mnemosientje (t · c) 12:29, 9 February 2019 (UTC)