Talk:-slovlje


 * Isn't this a metanalysis of ? Shouldn't be parsed as  +  or  +  + ? It would be similar to . --Barytonesis (talk) 23:29, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Sounds reasonable to me. I tagged it mainly because already existed, and I figured I'd look more closely later. embryomystic (talk) 23:34, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes, I’d definitely parse it as a combining form (equivalent to  + ) of  suffixed with . For what it's worth, it seems the most common convention in our existing Serbocroatian entries, as established by User:Ivan Štambuk back when he was active, was to just write e.g.  + . — Vorziblix (talk · contribs) 00:59, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Ok, I went ahead and replaced -oslovlje with -slovlje. As for the interfix, I almost never use them anywhere, but I suppose they don't harm either. --Barytonesis (talk) 02:11, 6 December 2017 (UTC)