Talk:-urnus

Redundant to -rnus?
I don't think we should have this. See. --Barytonesis (talk) 20:30, 29 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The suffix does not explain the relevant  in, , , and . — I.S.M.E.T.A. 21:15, 29 March 2017 (UTC)


 * I'd add to that list. De Vaan explains  by an earlier  (cf. ). --Barytonesis (talk) 21:47, 29 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The  states that those four words all derive from, but if De Vaan traces to a 🇨🇬, I'm happy to concede that one. As for , the derivation  leaves the  element unexplained; there are other  words – viz. , , and  – that are similarly inexplicable, so I wouldn't say that  necessarily points to an enlargement of the form *, but the derivation certainly isn't clear. — I.S.M.E.T.A. 23:03, 29 March 2017 (UTC)