Talk:69式性交

Deletion debate
Come on, let me delete my first page. This is an obvious sum of parts: "sixty-nine style sexual intercourse". ---&gt; Tooironic 00:48, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Why is this not deleted yet?! Jamesjiao → T ◊ C 00:58, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm new to the whole admin thing. Nobody has told me yet as to how I should use my discretion. Am I allowed to delete without RfDing if I know the entry is total SoP? ---&gt; Tooironic 01:03, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Much as I hate to admit it, sixty-nine (see etymology 2) is the sex act in English -- so unless we delete the English entry, why would we delete the Chinese?--71.111.229.19 01:15, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
 * 69式 is the Chinese translation for sixty-nine. 性交 just adds a noun of conceptual category; it's completely seperable from the original term. ---&gt; Tooironic 10:40, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Deleted, I looked up the separate parts and it does indeed mean 69 style sexual intercourse (see 69 + 式 + 性交). I figured I'd economize on time and just delete it per nomination. Mglovesfun (talk) 10:46, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

Central archive of RFD/RFV/RFC discussion of this and related terms
Please see Talk:Ampere定律. — Beobach 02:20, 14 December 2010 (UTC)