Talk:Artognou

RFV discussion: November 2016–March 2017
This is not Proto-Brythonic. It's written in British Latin. UtherPendrogn (talk) 15:45, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Don't change this without discussion. Also, British Latin is not an acceptable L2 language name.— JohnC5 17:23, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
 * I found it used on several other pages, like British Latin *biscopo. UtherPendrogn (talk) 18:33, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
 * So there is a distinction between the language heading and dialects mentioned before a link. You should use somehting like before the definition instead. — JohnC5 18:50, 2 November 2016 (UTC)


 * At present the headword doesn't agree with the page name. - -sche (discuss) 21:24, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
 * apparently resolved by being moved, and the headword line being updated. - -sche (discuss) 08:58, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

RFC discussion: May 2017
Is this Proto-Brythonic, or Latin? I thought our preference was to label e.g. Illyrian names attested only in Ancient Greek as ==Ancient Greek==, and explain in the definition that they are names of Illyrian individuals. This seems like a similar case. - -sche (discuss) 03:15, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
 * I still can't decide. Usually names are assimilated to a Latin declension class, but this doesn't seem to be. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 19:02, 31 May 2017 (UTC)