Talk:Atem-Rhythmus

RFV discussion: September–October 2023
German. Rfv-sense: It doesn't seem that this word is used in a special sense in poetry, but just seems like this author used the word in a general way just meaning that the poems are read with a rhythm caused by natural breathing, and not with artificial punctuation, but it doesn't seem like it is a separate meaning, and I couldn't find anything in dictionaries or online showing any. Eric Schiefelbein (talk) 09:33, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
 * You couldn’t as this is for that “Modern Poetry” in the 1960–1980s—not invented by this author. A lot of lofty talk in “contemporary” literary science contexts we are easily too dull for, one, two. How is it not a special sense if it is not the literal sense of applied to breathing with your lungs? At some point there must be a separate sense, though there are some other figurative ones which are vague, not contoured enough to be a separate sense, p. 67 :
 * ›Lebendgebärend‹ (ebd., 109) lautet das Attribut, das Georg Kerschensteiner diesem neuen, vom Spiel inspirierten Typus des Arbeitens verleiht – weil nicht mehr nur die Arbeit ›lebendig‹ ist, sondern bereits die Produkte dieser Arbeit selbst den Atemrhythmus einer Lebendigkeit teilen, deren Zeichen die Produktivität ist.
 * Unlike the one in question, which they tried to emphasize with the hyphen: You see, not even the quote I created the page with is found in corpora, as I quoted it from dead trees, which will have many more occurrences not in the digital corpora. But I think you got the definition here: A lyrical rhythm emphasizing natural breathing, or something like that. Modern art is a competition in dullness. Fay Freak (talk) 17:45, 13 September 2023 (UTC)

Passed —Caoimhin ceallach (talk) 23:28, 18 October 2023 (UTC)