Talk:BUMP

This is a back-formation, right? I've never seen it in CAPS before. Equinox ◑ 15:48, 13 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Oh? A back-formation from what? — I.S.M.E.T.A. 16:50, 13 June 2016 (UTC)


 * I mean a backronym. I thought originally it was just the usual word bump, like a sound effect. Equinox ◑ 16:56, 13 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Really? I'd never figured that, and I took instances of in this sense to be just laziness re capitalising acronyms and initialisms in informal contexts. Please feel free to correct the entry in whatever way you see fit. — I.S.M.E.T.A. 14:57, 18 June 2016 (UTC)


 * suggests this ety is a backronym too... I'll change it. Equinox ◑ 04:35, 22 June 2016 (UTC)


 * OK, cool. Might it not be worth mentioning the backronymous interpretation ("bring up my post") somewhere? Perhaps in an etymology section or something? — I.S.M.E.T.A. 23:19, 23 June 2016 (UTC)


 * I don't really see the point of listing folk etymologies. It somehow seems to legitimise them. What do you want to say? "The supposed etymology Council House and Vulgar has no basis!" Okay. Anyway, add it if you really want! Equinox ◑ 23:53, 23 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Well, if we had an alternative-form entry for, wouldn't it make sense to explain that the word was misinterpreted as an acronym, and to give examples thereof? — I.S.M.E.T.A. 14:20, 24 June 2016 (UTC)