Talk:Bangla-

RFD discussion: March–April 2022
Not really a prefix; just Bangla. ·~  dictátor · mundꟾ  11:03, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
 * ·~  dictátor · mundꟾ  19:26, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. There is zero merit from having this. Inb4 somebody creates Banglo- as in attestable Banglophone. But other entries in Appendix:English nationality prefixes appear sketchy. Where is the proof that Turcmeno- is not a Latin form of Turkmen plus interfix? Or that they are even English as opposed to Translingual morphemes? Having them as translingual would at least be parsimonious; the endings then only, as -phone, are language-specific. Fay Freak (talk) 19:35, 21 March 2022 (UTC)


 * RFD-deleted. ·~   dictátor · mundꟾ  10:11, 6 April 2022 (UTC)


 * I have to say that I don't really understand why something like Italo- is valid but Bangla- isn't (assuming the prefix is in comparable use). But the consensus should be upheld. 70.172.194.25 22:38, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Because Italo- is a well-established and real affix. ·~   dictátor · mundꟾ  20:38, 11 June 2022 (UTC)