Talk:Botevgrad

app
No need to be in Appendix Ballot man jr (talk) 21:23, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Very odd, there was a deletion debate and it was unkept unanimously, but then it was moved to the appendix. Renard Migrant (talk) 21:28, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Deletion debate
Someone boxify this shit for me. Renard Migrant (talk) 21:28, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

I've heard of a New York delicatessen, but never a Botevgrad delicatessen. Is it used attributively, or can it be deleted? -- Beobach972 18:38, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Keep for reasons given at Barrow Bay above.


 * Keep. One of the great reasons Wiktionary can be better than other dictionaries is the fact that it can hold place names and their translations, even for lesser-known places.  I, along with another person commenting on these place names nominated for deletion, don't understand why something must be used attributively for us to like it.  Place names are words, they can be defined (i.e., a city in such-and-such county in such-and-such state or country), and can be translated.  All great reason to have them in Wiktionary. &mdash; V-ball 17:58, 12 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep. —Stephen 11:18, 14 March 2007 (UTC)