Talk:Brown bounce

Boris bounce
About polling boosts. Actually lexical? We've also got "Biden bounce" "Cameron bounce", "Sunak bounce" , even "Truss bounce" (mercifully hypothetical , , ). Best dealt with at bounce I think. —Al-Muqanna المقنع (talk) 13:29, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
 * delete per nom. We should probably create a new sense at bounce to cover these phrases though (preferably one that also makes sense in the expression ‘bounce in the polls’). --Overlordnat1 (talk) 13:51, 31 July 2023 (UTC)


 * There's nothing to back these up. Gordon Brown walked straight into a recession, was less charismatic than Blair, and lost the next election. As for Johnson, heh, he has bounced off the field. DonnanZ (talk) 16:48, 31 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Irrelevant: unicorns don't exist but still gets a dictionary entry. Equinox ◑ 16:50, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Irrelevant? Thankfully, we have been saved from Rishi bounce and Sunak bounce so far... DonnanZ (talk) 17:10, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Rishi Sunak’s poll bounce shows that he’s still the Tories’ best hope -- State of the Nation. Close enough. cf (talk) 00:41, 2 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Well, these seem like the words that we see for every new national leader... Equinox ◑ 16:50, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Those are at least actual words though rather than phrases. "[name] bounce" is just SOP. —Al-Muqanna المقنع (talk)
 * I'm going to surprise you by voting delete, not for the SoP reason. DonnanZ (talk) 17:27, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Are we right to conclude that you're voting delete because you think they're factually incorrect, then? Theknightwho (talk) 01:11, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. SoP. cf (talk) 02:20, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Jberkel 07:49, 7 September 2023 (UTC)


 * RFD failed for both. Admin needs to delete P. Sovjunk (talk) 13:23, 30 September 2023 (UTC)