Talk:CC-BY-SA

RFD discussion: February 2019–March 2020
Some kinda Creative Commons licence, a trendy Internet thing so of course it got an entry here. But is it an abbreviation? Not exactly. Is it a word? Not exactly. It's more like a code, like an accounting system where "34" means "donations". Equinox ◑ 06:12, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
 * It is categorized as a proper noun. What about uses as in “The operator of an MMC Site may republish an MMC contained in the site under CC-BY-SA on the same site ...”, and “I did not reflect the CC-BY-SA terms on my board for clarity ...”? --Lambiam 08:52, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Incoterms are included too though. This is not different in essence. Seems like abbrevations of licenses being around should be included. They are nouns (“license”). Fay Freak (talk) 20:52, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
 * It's a code of sort, used nominally, and we have kept that kind of thing before (e.g. E100). I guess I lean to a weak keep. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 20:57, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

No consensus to delete after well over a year. bd2412 T 04:51, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

RFM discussion: August–September 2022

 * See Talk:CC-BY