Talk:Dominicoon

RFV discussion: July–August 2022
This is exactly the kind of entry WT:DEROGATORY was made for. 98.170.164.88 22:18, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

Americoon
,, &mdash; Fytcha〈 T | L | C 〉 01:07, 21 July 2022 (UTC)


 * And here we go. It hasn't even been 3 days since the vote has passed and the first trivially citable derogatory term has already been speedied. &mdash; Fytcha〈 T | L | C 〉 12:31, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
 * deleted it; because two weeks have not passed since the RFV, I have undeleted it. J3133 (talk) 13:03, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
 * More than two weeks had passed since its creation, so it was deletable under WT:DEROGATORY even without an RFV. —Mahāgaja · talk 13:19, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
 * “An editor may nominate this entry or the challenged sense(s) for deletion or verification by editing it to apply the template, , , or as appropriate. If the entry does not have at least three quotations meeting the attestation requirements within two weeks of the nomination date, the entry may also be speedily deleted.” J3133 (talk) 13:22, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
 * : As the proposal is yours, who is correct? J3133 (talk) 13:27, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I had intended your interpretation, but I can see how the policy might be ambiguous on the point. If there’s really confusion over the issue, after the policy has been in place for a month or two, we can decide if it needs tweaks and a further clarificatory vote. — Sgconlaw (talk) 19:06, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
 * @Fytcha The policy specifically says that it's without prejudice to re-creation. Theknightwho (talk) 04:08, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Failed per WT:DEROGATORY. No qualifying quotations added. — Sgconlaw (talk) 11:53, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Funny guy. &mdash; Fytcha〈 T | L | C 〉 23:13, 5 August 2022 (UTC)