Talk:Dutch alphabet

Dutch alphabet
and most of the other contents of Category:en:Alphabets, to wit: Esperanto alphabet, Greek alphabet, Hawaiian alphabet, Hungarian alphabet, Latin alphabet, Lojban alphabet, Macedonian alphabet, Pashto alphabet, Phoenician alphabet, Proto-Canaanite alphabet, Roman alphabet, Romanian alphabet, Russian alphabet, Slovene alphabet, Sorani alphabet, Turkish alphabet, Zhuyin alphabet, Arabic script, Glagolitic alphabet and Khmer script. They all seem SOPpy to me; the lists of precisely which letters constitute the Macedonian alphabet seems encyclopedic. (It's not that we can't make the information short enough to "fit" in a dictionary-definition, it's just...do we want to?) I checked for previous discussion and only found Talk:Phoenician alphabet. (Addendum: also most of the contents of Category:Alphabets.) - -sche (discuss) 17:30, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I agree, delete, especially as there already is Appendix:Latin script alphabets. —CodeCat 17:48, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect, perhaps? --Yair rand (talk) 18:05, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
 * How about each gets an entry like: "The alphabet used by the Dutch language, consisting of the basic Latin alphabet + [insert letters]"? Delete. But when there is a specific alphabet for a language (Khmer, Canaanite, Glagolitic) that sense should be added to the entry.Korn (talk) 20:35, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Yup, delete -- Liliana • 21:42, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete all. SOP of Dutch (pertaining ... to the Dutch language) + alphabet. Ungoliant MMDCCLXIV 20:19, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Deleted by -sche. — T AKASUGI Shinji (talk) 08:55, 9 August 2012 (UTC)